NetPerHash

tokenized mining, computed

data as of 2026-08-30

1,000 dollars into mining — or 1,000 dollars into Bitcoin?

Same money, same one-year horizon, all fees deducted: what is left at the end on each side — and difficulty keeps rising?

Your setup editable example, not a recommendation

at today's vendor price of $9.99 per TH (all collections identical, vendor pricing, retrieved 2026-08-30), 1,000 dollars buys about 100 TH
the vendor sets which machines run — you cannot choose their class; 15 W/TH is the documented default class (vendor docs, retrieved 2026-08-30)
0% if you hold none; a real reference account shows 28.26% combined (retrieved 2026-08-30 — see Explained)
Default 9% — my strongest observed lever: a verified account that reinvests 100% of its payout grew 807.06 → 810.13 TH within days, and 744 → 816 TH (+9%) across a 63-day stretch (account data via the official API, retrieved 2026-08-30). Growth adds TH — and the same growth multiplies your fee lines, so it lifts both sides of the ledger.

Advanced — every pre-filled value shows its source and retrieval date loading…
loading…
3.125 BTC — Bitcoin protocol; next halving estimated April 2028 (retrieved 2026-08-30)
$0.05 — the documented lower bound of the vendor's $0.05–0.07 range (retrieved 2026-08-30); it matched the account data to within a cent. Enter your own rate if you know better.
+20% is an assumption, not data. Rises in all three price paths below.
defaults to 0% (the vendor pays reward-distribution fees itself, per its documentation)
Assumptions behind these numbers (full detail on the Method page)

What this page is

This page runs one calculation, once, on both sides of the same dollars: the money either buys a share of a real mining operation — a tokenized miner whose machines, power price and efficiency the platform sets, not you (how that works) — or it buys plain Bitcoin and holds it. The result, after every documented fee, is the table above, per price path. Everything you can edit is yours to edit; everything pre-filled carries its source and retrieval date. The model behind it was checked day-by-day against a real account (how, and how well); this page just asks the one question and shows the answer — no sign-up, no promised number anywhere.

When mining wins — and when holding wins

At the defaults above ($1,000, 100 TH, no discount, +9% reinvestment growth, difficulty +20%), holding ends ahead in all three paths — by ≈$669 flat, ≈$713 if Bitcoin rises 50%, ≈$571 if it falls a third. The shortfall is mechanical: at documented rates the miner yields about $1.21 per day per $1,000 invested (≈27 months to recover the purchase at start rates), while plain Bitcoin starts free of any fee bill.

Mining's observed levers close roughly half that gap on the same day's numbers: the reference account's 28.26% maintenance discount lifts the same setup's net yield to about $1.97 per day (the gap shrinks to ≈$379 flat) — and an honest exit price does the rest, because a share of mining power does not wear out. The one secondary-market check this project could make (2026-08-30, with an account session: cheapest listing ≈96% of the primary price; seller nets ≈91% after the documented 5% fee) supports the idea that tokenized hashrate resells near its purchase price — today. Whether it does a year from now is the single make-or-break assumption, and this homepage deliberately leaves it at zero: no exit-price promise belongs in the front door. The Calculator carries it as an explicit lever with its break-even math (at its defaults, mining ties holding only if you resell for ≈92% of purchase price after 12 months).

Conditions, not predictions: mining wins when fee-discounted, reinvested yield plus a defensible resale value outruns the coins the same dollars could have simply bought. Holding wins whenever that fails — prices fall (mined coins fall with them, and resale gets harder), difficulty outgrows efficiency, or any rate on the vendor's side changes, which their Terms allow at any time. The table above shows both outcomes at once, per path, so the decision stays yours and checkable.

How we know the math is right

This engine was validated day-by-day against a real mining account over 63 days (2026-06-28 to 2026-08-29): 60 of 63 days within ±2% (account data via the official GoMining API, retrieved 2026-08-30; see the Log page and the Method page).

Engine self-test (runs in your browser, same engine as the results)

    About this page

    NetPerHash (domain registered 2026-08-28) is a one-person, non-commercial project: tokenized mining, computed instead of marketed. The figures are either public with source and retrieval date, or come from the operator's own account, published figure-by-figure with per-figure approval — no wallet addresses, deposit addresses or balances anywhere on this site.

    Update log.

    [Further entries appended here with dates as sources are re-verified monthly and figures move.]

    All numbers computed in your browser from one calculation engine verified by automated tests. Sources retrieved 2026-08-30 unless marked live.